Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tony Haines's avatar

Mark, I've found that writing about my relationship with God often helps me understand what I've experienced. But I've also learned to distinguish the relationship from the words I use to describe it.

Your discussion of Logos raises an interesting question for me. When you describe words as spiritually active, do you mean what happens between people through language, or are you suggesting something about the nature of language itself?

Paul Hughes's avatar

Buechner — 

John was a poet and he knew about words. He knew that all men and all women are mysteries known only to themselves until they speak a word that opens up the mystery. He knew that the words people speak have their life in them just as surely as they have their breath in them. He knew that the words people speak have dynamite in them and that a word may be all it takes to set somebody’s heart on fire or break it in two. He knew that words break silence and that the word that is spoken is the word that is heard and may even be answered. And at the beginning of the gospel he wrote a poem about the Word that God spoke.

When God speaks, things happen because the words of God aren’t just as good as his deeds, they are his deeds. When he speaks his word, John says, creation happens, and when God speaks to his creation what comes out is not ancient Hebrew or the King James Version or a sentiment suitable for framing in the pastor’s study.

What comes out is flesh.

When God wanted to say what God is all about and what man is all about it wasn’t a sound that emerged but a man.

/

At their most poetic and powerful they do not say something as much as they make something happen.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?